Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We probed the high-pressure response of the YV 1– x P x O 4:Eu 3+ ( x = 0, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0) solid-solution nanoparticles using angular dispersive synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman techniques at room temperature. In situ diffraction results showed that the overall nanoparticles underwent an irreversible zircon-to-scheelite structural transformation. The transition pressures were ∼9.3, ∼12.1, ∼14, and ∼18.4 GPa for the YV 1– x P x O 4:Eu 3+ ( x = 0, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0) samples, respectively. Coupled with the zircon-to-scheelite transition features, it was proposed that the transition pressure was probably governed by the stiffness of VO 4 /PO 4 units in the solid solutions. This claim was verified by further Raman measurements, which revealed that the stiffness of VO 4 /PO 4 units was enhanced with increasing P contents. The structural refinements showed that the samples with comparable particle size (20–90 nm) became less compressible with increasing P content ( x = 0 → 0.7 → 1.0). However, the compressibility of the YV 0.5 P 0.5 O 4:Eu 3+ sample with smaller particle size (10–30 nm) was similar to that of the YV 0.3 P 0.7 O 4:Eu 3+ sample. The general compressibility behavior as a function of P content was ascribed to the special packing style related to the stiffness of VO 4 /PO 4 tetrahedra in zircon structure, and the higher surface energy contribution was responsible for the exceptional compressibility in the smaller nanoparticles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: