Key result
Healthism in hypertension care fosters patient distress and erodes patient-provider trust.
The individualization of health responsibility in hypertension care can erode patient-provider trust and cause emotional distress, highlighting the need for structural support rather than just individual blame.
Healthism, a neoliberal ideology that frames health as an individual responsibility and moral duty, inherently operates as a blame-the-victim framework, attributing health outcomes primarily to personal choices and behaviours. This qualitative study critically examines healthism's influence on community-based hypertension care in China, particularly its reinforcement of individualised blame and patient distress. Based on semi-structured interviews with 18 community health professionals and 17 hypertensive patients in Shenzhen, the study reveals that while self-care is promoted as essential to hypertension management, it often fosters feelings of inadequacy and social isolation, particularly among patients struggling to meet the expectations set by healthcare providers. Participants also report emotional distress exacerbated by socio-economic challenges that remain unaddressed within the healthcare system. Moreover, the individualisation of health responsibility erodes trust between patients and providers, as patients internalise failure when unable to adhere to prescribed lifestyle modifications. This study critiques the reductive association between patient autonomy and improved health outcomes, advocating for a more holistic approach to hypertension care that acknowledges broader social determinants of health and prioritises structural support for patient well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bo Li (2025) studied Hypertension (n=35). Healthism was evaluated on Patient distress and patient-provider trust. In a qualitative study of 35 participants, healthism in hypertension care fostered patient inadequacy, social isolation, and emotional distress, eroding trust between patients and providers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: