Why the study?
Prior studies of stress cardiomyopathy used ICD codes in administrative databases without evaluating the validity of these codes.
ICD codes for stress cardiomyopathy have a high positive predictive value (98%), particularly when used as a principal diagnosis, supporting their use in epidemiological research despite limitations in capturing complete diagnostic workups.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ICD codes for SCM show high PPV; supports administrative database research but leaves sensitivity and external validity open.
Prior studies of stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify patients in administrative databases without evaluating the validity of these codes. Between 2010 and 2016, we identified 592 patients discharged with a first known principal or secondary ICD code for SCM in our medical system. On chart review, 580 charts had a diagnosis of SCM (positive predictive value 98%; 95% CI: 96.4-98.8), although 38 (6.4%) did not have active clinical manifestations of SCM during the hospitalization. Moreover, only 66.8% underwent cardiac catheterization and 91.5% underwent echocardiography. These findings suggest that, although all but a few hospitalized patients with an ICD code for SCM had a diagnosis of SCM, some of these were chronic cases, and numerous patients with a new diagnosis of SCM did not undergo a complete diagnostic workup. Researchers should be mindful of these limitations in future studies involving administrative databases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhat et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: