Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An ATP‐driven rise in fluorescence yield (Q reduction) and cytochrome f oxidation in light‐triggered chloroplasts are demonstrated. Both effects are shown to be dependent on the creation and maintenance of the light‐triggered state. ATP‐induced reduction of Q depends upon the presence of an electron donor in the dark with a redox potential up to, but not exceeding, 300 mV. The effects are abolished by uncouplers or energy transfer inhibitors. 3‐(3,4‐Dichlorophenyl)‐1,1‐dimethylurea inhibits the ATP‐driven reduction of Q but not that of cytochrome oxidation. A location for a coupling site and the site of action of electron‐transport inhibitors is suggested on the basis of these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rienits et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: