The R obbins report published half a century ago in 1963 has overshadowed all subsequent reports on the reform of higher education. A large part of its significance was that it made the case for expansion and therefore set higher education in the U nited K ingdom on the road to become a mass system. However the committee's recommendations for the future structure of the expanded system appeared to be quickly contradicted by the introduction of the binary policy and the creation of the polytechnics by C rosland, S ecretary Of S tate for E ducation and S cience in the incoming L abour government. Only in the 1990s, was the R obbins path resumed when the binary policy was abandoned. However, an alternative account is possible, which argues that the differences between R obbins and C rosland have been exaggerated. Both R obbins and C rosland believed that the future system should be dominated by large, comprehensive and multi‐faculty institutions. Only now are the fundamental ideas of Robbins being challenged: first, as the idea that there should be a ‘system’ of higher education is being eroded by the introduction of a ‘market’; and, second, as the parallel idea that any system should be essentially ‘public’ is being undermined by the drive towards privatisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Scott (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: