Breadth First Search (BFS) is a widely used approach for sampling large graphs. However, it has been empirically observed that BFS sampling is biased toward high-degree nodes, which may strongly affect the measurement results. In this paper, we quantify and correct the degree bias of BFS. First, we consider a random graph RG(pk) with an arbitrary degree distribution pk. For this model, we calculate the node degree distribution expected to be observed by BFS as a function of the fraction f of covered nodes. We also show that, for RG(pk), all commonly used graph traversal techniques (BFS, DFS, Forest Fire, Snowball Sampling, RDS) have exactly the same bias. Next, we propose a practical BFS-bias correction procedure that takes as input a collected BFS sample together with the fraction f. Our correction technique is exact (i.e., leads to unbiased estimation) for RG(pk). Furthermore, it performs well when applied to a broad range of Internet topologies and to two large BFS samples of Facebook and Orkut networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurant et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: