PURPOSE: to evaluate the monocular and binocular visual outcomes of LASIK with a non-linear aspheric micro-monovision protocol for the correction of myopic astigmatism and presbyopia. METHODS: a retrospective, noncomparative case series included 310 eyes of 155 consecutive patients with myopic astigmatism and presbyopia who were treated with LASIK-induced micro-monovision. The Carl Zeiss Meditec CRS-Master software and MEL 80 excimer laser were used. The target refraction was plano for distance eyes (dominant eye) and between -0.75 and -2.00 diopters (D) for near eyes. Patients were followed for 1 year. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SE) correction was -3.59 ± 1.79 D (range: -0.20 to -8.31 D). Mean attempted cylinder correction was 0.84 ± 0.63 D (range: 0 to 2.50 D). Median patient age was 49 years (range: 43 to 63 years). Median follow-up was 12.5 months. RESULTS: outcome measures after all treatments were as follows. Achieved SE correction was within ± 0.50 D in 92% and within ± 1.00 D in 99% of eyes. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 in 99% and 20/32 in 100% of distance eyes. Binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was J2 in 96% and J5 in 100% of patients. Binocular uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 and J5 in 99% of patients. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. There was no change in mesopic contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000) at all spatial frequencies. The average change in refraction between 3 months and 1 year was -0.0 6± 0.31 D. CONCLUSIONS: this non-linear aspheric myopic micro-monovision protocol was well-tolerated, stable, and effective for treating patients with presbyopia in moderate to high myopic astigmatism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinstein et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: