BACKGROUND Consolidation therapy for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) includes high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT), yet its efficacy compared with non-myeloablative chemoimmunotherapy remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide randomised comparative evidence on the efficacy and safety of thiotepa-based HCT-ASCT versus non-myeloablative R-DeVIC consolidation after uniform MATRix induction in newly diagnosed PCNSL. METHODS This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted across 56 university and academic non-university hospitals with established transplantation facilities in five European countries. Eligible for inclusion were untreated, immunocompetent patients with B-cell PCNSL, aged 18-65 years regardless of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, or 66-70 years with ECOG performance status 0-2. Pretreatment corticosteroids were permitted. Exclusion criteria included lymphoma manifestation outside the CNS, and congenital or acquired immunodeficiency. Patients received four cycles of MATRix induction (comprising rituximab, high-dose cytarabine, and thiotepa, in addition to high-dose methotrexate). Patients reaching at least partial response were randomly assigned (1:1) to two cycles of R-DeVIC (rituximab plus dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and carboplatin) or HCT-ASCT with carmustine and thiotepa. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed in the full analysis set (excluding patients with major violations of entry criteria). The safety analysis set contained all randomised patients who initiated therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02531841) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT number 2012-000620-17). The study is completed. FINDINGS Between July 16, 2014, and Aug 31, 2019, 368 patients were enrolled. 346 (94%) patients started induction treatment, and 230 were randomly assigned; 229 patients were analysed (R-DeVIC group, n=115; HCT-ASCT group, n=114). After a median follow-up of 45·3 months, 3-year progression-free survival was significantly superior in the HCT-ASCT group (hazard ratio 0·43 95% CI 0·27-0·68; p=0·0003). The 3-year progression-free survival was 78% (95% CI 69-85) in the HCT-ASCT group compared with 51% (41-60) in the R-DeVIC group. The mean number of adverse events per patient was 9·3 (SD 4·4) in the R-DeVIC group and 14·6 (5·8) in the HCT-ASCT group. Fatal serious adverse events following consolidation treatment occurred in two patients in the R-DeVIC group (both acute myeloid leukaemia) and in five patients in the HCT-ASCT group (infections and infestations n=4, pulmonary embolism n=1); all of these events apart from the pulmonary embolism were judged to be possibly related to treatment. INTERPRETATION In the largest randomised trial in untreated PCNSL to date, HCT-ASCT significantly improved progression-free and overall survival compared with non-myeloablative consolidation in patients who had completed induction treatment, establishing it as the preferred consolidation strategy in fit patients. FUNDING German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space; Swiss Cancer Research Foundation; and Riemser Pharma.
Illerhaus et al. (Wed,) studied this question.