Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While the experimental (1)H NMR chemical shiftsof the 1-adamantyl cation can be computed within reasonably small error bounds, the usual Hartree-Fock and density functional quantum-chemical computations, as well as those based on rather elaborate second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, fail to reproduce its experimental (13)C NMR chemical shifts satisfactorily. This also is true even if the NMR shielding calculations treat electron correlation adequately by the coupled-cluster singles and doubles model augmented by a perturbative correction for triple excitations (i.e., at the CCSD(T) level) with quadruple-ζ basis sets. We demonstrate that good agreement can be achieved if highly accurate 1-adamantyl cation equilibrium geometries based on parallel computations of CCSD(T) gradients are employed for the NMR shielding computations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harding et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: