To improve the scarce data base of H 2 O content in tektites and impact glasses, we analyzed 26 tektites from all four strewn fields and 25 impact glass samples for their H 2 O content. We used the fourier‐transformed infrared (FTIR) spectrometry method, which permits measurement of areas of ∼40 μm in diameter. Our results show that the tektites have H 2 O contents ranging from 0.002 to 0.030 wt% (average 0.014 ± 0.008 wt%). Ivory Coast tektites have the lowest H 2 O abundances (0.002–0.003 wt%), and Muong Nong‐type indochinites and some North American tektites having the highest contents (up to ∼0.03 wt%). Impact glass samples (from the Zhamanshin, Aouelloul, and Rio Cuarto craters) yielded H 2 O contents of 0.008 to 0.13 wt% H 2 O. Typical impact glasses from the Aouelloul and Zhamanshin craters have low H 2 O contents (0.008 to 0.063 wt%). Libyan Desert Glasses and Rio Cuarto glasses have higher H 2 O contents (∼0.11 wt%). We also analyzed glasses of unknown origin ( e.g. , urengoites; glass fragments from Tikal), which showed very low H 2 O contents, in agreement with an origin by impact. Our data confirm that all tektites found on land have very low H 2 O contents (<0.03 wt% H 2 O), while impact glasses have slightly higher H 2 O contents. Both glass types are very dry compared to volcanic glasses. This study confirms that the low H 2 O contents (<0.05 wt%) of such glasses can be considered good evidence for an origin by impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beran et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: