Why the study?
Does ethanol with lorazepam improve safety and prevent complications compared to lorazepam alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and alcohol dependence?
Does ethanol with lorazepam improve safety and prevent complications compared to lorazepam alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and alcohol dependence?
A pilot randomized evaluation suggests that using ethanol with lorazepam to prevent alcohol withdrawal complications in patients with acute myocardial infarction is safe and feasible, with no significant difference in complication rates compared to lorazepam alone.
Comparable safety supports ethanol adjunct in alcohol-dependent AMI; leaves open efficacy for withdrawal prevention in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome, characterized by confusion, agitation, and hallucinations, decreases the safety of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Unexpected hospitalization and sudden cessation of alcohol consumption may increase in-hospital complications and length of stay and even precipitate death. PURPOSE: To perform a randomized evaluation of lorazepam and ethanol/lorazepam to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these 2 strategies for preventing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: Patients (n = 57) with myocardial infarction were screened for alcohol dependence by using the CAGE questionnaire and randomized to treatment with lorazepam or ethanol with lorazepam. Demographics and complication rates were analyzed by using χ² tests (categorical variables) and t tests (continuous variables). Safety (composite complication rates) of the treatment strategy was evaluated by using the Fisher exact test, and length of stay by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: Safety-associated complication rates (self-extubation, delirium tremens, reinfarction) did not differ between groups (24% lorazepam vs 18% ethanol; P = .56). Days spent in the cardiac intensive care unit (7% lorazepam vs 2% ethanol; P = .32) and overall hospital stay (6% lorazepam vs 6% ethanol; P = .72) did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that a randomized evaluation of treatment strategies to prevent complications associated with alcohol withdrawal in patients with acute myocardial infarction is safe and feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fullwood et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: