A CeO 2 –TiO 2 nanocomposite was synthesized solvothermally using ascorbic acid (A), urea (U), or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Powder X-ray and selected area electron diffractometries and Raman spectroscopy confirm the anatase phase of TiO 2 and face-centered cubic lattice of CeO 2 . Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirms the purity of the synthesized composites and provides their compositions. Scanning electron, field emission scanning electron, and transmission electron microscopies give the sizes and shapes of the synthesized nanoparticles. UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy shows the optical absorption edges of CeO 2 –TiO 2 (A), CeO 2 –TiO 2 (U), and CeO 2 –TiO 2 (PVP) as 510, 441, and 410 nm, respectively. The blue, blue-green, and green emissions shown by the three nanocomposites indicate the existence of defects such as oxygen vacancies in the crystal lattices. All three composites differ in their electrical properties, obtained by solid-state impedance spectroscopy. Furthermore, solid-state impedance spectroscopy shows photoconductance of CeO 2 –TiO 2 confirming the band gap excitation by visible light. Under UV as well as visible light, the nanocomposite synthesized using ascorbic acid is the most efficient photocatalyst to detoxify cyanide in alkaline solution; the composite synthesized with urea is the least active photocatalyst. At neutral pH, CeO 2 –TiO 2 synthesized with ascorbic acid is the most active to photocatalytically degrade dye, and the order of photocatalytic activity remains unaltered. The synthesized nanocomposites are not only photocatalysts but are bactericides as well. Ascorbic acid-assisted solvothermally synthesized CeO 2 –TiO 2 is the most efficient bactericide, tested with S. aureus in the absence of direct light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karunakaran et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: