Transient absorption and time-resolved microwave studies have been carried out on a series of D(onor) 2 −[bridge]−D(onor) 1 −[bridge]−A(cceptor) compounds, in which a dimethoxynaphthalene (DMN) primary donor (D 1 ) and a dicyanovinyl (DCV) acceptor are separated by a rigid norbornylogous bridge eight σ-bonds in length and an N, N -dimethylaniline secondary donor (D 2 ) is separated from D 1 by a norbornylogous bridge of variable length (four, six, or eight σ-bonds). The identity of the charge-separated state populated upon photoexcitation, i.e., from D 1 to A or from D 2 to A, depends on the solvent polarity and the length of the bridge separating both donor chromophores. It was found that the final charge-separated state is formed on a (sub)nanosecond time scale, whereas charge recombination shows strong solvent dependence, due to “inverted region” behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roest et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: