By the early 1950s, the Golden Age of Argentine cinema (1933−55) was exhausting tried and tested methods for commercial success with mixed results.1 This industrial, studio-led period of film production, which coincided with the rise of fascism, Perón, and World War II, brought into stark relief contrasting projections of the national in Argentine film. On the one hand, film adaptations of canonical literary texts exalting rural landscapes and the spirit of their gaucho protagonists would present elite audiences with comforting fictions of cohesion and Argentine particularity. On the other, popular comedies and melodramas riffed on working-class experiences of the metropolis, triumphantly celebrating the Argentinization of immigrant forms as emblematized in the music of the tango. This description of Golden Age Argentine cinema is, of course, overly schematic; in reality there were many more shades of nationalism and class (dis)harmony during this turbulent period. What is certain, though, is that film critics and industry journalists, at home and abroad, were actively engaged in disputing the idea of Argentineness, or argentinidad, in film, in elevating the idea of national cinema, and in debating the gains and limitations offered by state-sanctioned investment in the sector.2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlotte Gleghorn (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: