Why the study?
Does combination pharmacotherapy improve clinical outcomes compared to monotherapy or placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does combination pharmacotherapy improve clinical outcomes compared to monotherapy or placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Current evidence on combination therapy for PAH is inconclusive, suggesting its use primarily when patients fail to improve or deteriorate on monotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unclear efficacy of PAH combination therapy cautions against routine use; leaves open its role versus monotherapy pending larger trials.
As a result of the multimechanistic pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is emerging as a potential treatment option. Recent guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians and expert consensus from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association do not definitively support or disapprove of combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of PAH. Published trials have investigated different combinations including endothelin receptor antagonists with prostanoids, prostanoids with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors with endothelin receptor antagonists. Pertinent trials on combination pharmacotherapy for PAH were identified through a MEDLINE search of literature from 1967-2009 in addition to a manual search of references from the articles retrieved. Search results identified 12 trials that evaluated combination therapy for PAH; some included an add-on agent for patients who failed treatment with monotherapy and others were placebo controlled. Even with the published data, the overall consensus is unclear. Well-designed, larger trials with validated end points are needed to further identify when to initiate combination therapy for the treatment of PAH. Meanwhile, perhaps the most appropriate situation for using combination pharmacotherapy may be in the setting of a lack of clinical improvement or deterioration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: