This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aim The global burden of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to rise, with evidence suggesting that air pollution may contribute to its pathogenesis. This study examines the association between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and the risk of developing T2D in a cohort of older Danish men living in a low-exposure setting. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study using 16,665 participants from the Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial, aged 65-74 years without T2D at baseline. Residential PM 2.5 was modeled with the DEHM/UBM/AIRGIS system from historical address data; road-traffic noise was estimated with Nord2000. Cox models with age as timescale evaluated time-varying PM 2.5 exposure and T2D risk, adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status, socioeconomic factors, and traffic noise exposure. Results Over a mean 9.3-year follow-up, 324 participants (1.9%) developed T2D. Incidence was lower than reported in prevention trials, reflecting differences in population risk and registry-based outcome capture. Participants who developed T2D had slightly higher long-term PM 2.5 exposure compared to non-cases (12.12 vs 11.93 μg/m 3 ; p<0.001). Although absolute differences in exposure were small, they were consistent across the exposure distribution, suggesting a population-level effect even in a low-pollution environment. In adjusted time-varying Cox models, a 1.15 μg/m 3 increment in PM 2.5 was associated with a 30.6% higher risk of T2D (HR 1.306, 95% CI 1.08–1.58; p=0.006). Associations were independent of body mass index, smoking, socioeconomic status, and traffic noise. Conclusions Long-term PM 2.5 exposure was associated with T2D incidence in this cohort of older Danish men. Findings are hypothesis-generating, most applicable to low-to-moderate exposure settings, and should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayntz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: