Why the study?
The authors aimed to assess the prevalence of unknown AF among adults undergoing single-time point rhythm screening during meetings or social recreational activities.
Does single-time point screening using a handheld single-lead ECG device effectively detect unknown atrial fibrillation in adults?
Does single-time point screening using a handheld single-lead ECG device effectively detect unknown atrial fibrillation in adults?
Single-time point screening with a handheld single-lead ECG device detects unknown AF in 2.0% of adults, with CHA2DS2-VASc scores providing high sensitivity for identifying those at risk.
May support opportunistic community AF screening; leaves open whether detection improves outcomes.
Our aim was to assess the prevalence of unknown atrial fibrillation (AF) among adults during single-time point rhythm screening performed during meetings or social recreational activities organized by patient groups or volunteers. A total of 2814 subjects (median age 68 years) underwent AF screening by a handheld single-lead ECG device (MyDiagnostick). Overall, 56 subjects (2.0%) were diagnosed with AF, as a result of 12-lead ECG following a positive/suspected recording. Screening identified AF in 2.9% of the subjects ≥ 65 years. None of the 265 subjects aged below 50 years was found positive at AF screening. Risk stratification for unknown AF based on a CHA2DS2VASc > 0 in males and >1 in females (or CHA2DS2VA > 0) had a high sensitivity (98.2%) and a high negative predictive value (99.8%) for AF detection. A slightly lower sensitivity (96.4%) was achieved by using age ≥ 65 years as a risk stratifier. Conversely, raising the threshold at ≥75 years showed a low sensitivity. Within the subset of subjects aged ≥ 65 a CHA2DS2VASc > 1 in males and >2 in females, or a CHA2DS2VA > 1 had a high sensitivity (94.4%) and negative predictive value (99.3%), while age ≥ 75 was associated with a marked drop in sensitivity for AF detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boriani et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: