This paper discusses the increasingly corporatist mentality within higher education, focusing on the role of the government within Canada, and elsewhere, to reshape higher education into narrow occupational training. It notes that while governments in Canada and the United States have reduced public funding for higher education, they have pursued agendas of increasing accountability through quantifiable outcomes and the forced narrowing of education to production of the workforce. The paper cites numerous critics of the corporatist-conservative agenda who discuss the growing role of government and business in shaping and spreading this agenda. It examines recent efforts by local and provincial governments in Canada to reshape higher education ministries to focus on worker training, to the neglect or outright abandonment of the humanist emphasis of higher education. The paper concludes that the potentials of these trends and corporatist controls include the loss, for future generations, of the critical sensibilities necessary to evaluate and reorder the state/corporate agenda. (Contains 19 references.) (MDM) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** Higher Education & the Economy 1 HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE SERVICE OF THE ECONOMY: Education Ministry Reconfigurations and the Corporatist Agenda Marc Cutright Doctoral candidate, College of Education The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Marc-Cutright@utc.edu Bryant Griffith, Ph.D. Assistant Dean, Faculty of Education The University of Calgary griffithgacs.ucalgary.ca Presented at the Parkland Institute Conference The University of Alberta November 8, 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Gt/rhis document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY marccQtragbt_ TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC). _ BEST COPY AVAILABLE
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cutright et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: