PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of knee flexion and weight bearing on the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TTTG) distance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was carried out in 8 healthy volunteers. An open 0.25 T scanner equipped with a C-shaped permanent tilting magnet allowing examinations in weight-bearing conditions was used for the present investigation. A 3D gradient-echo sequence with axial slice orientation was obtained in a lying and an upright position with the knee straight and at 30° of knee flexion. The medial, central and lateral trochlear heights as well as the TTTG were determined. RESULTS: The mean medial trochlear height was 76.2 ± 4%, the central trochlear height was 72.2 ± 3%, and lateral trochlear height was 82.9 ± 3 %. The mean TTTG distance was 11.6 ± 4.4 mm in lying position at 0° knee flexion and 7.3 ± 2.9 mm (n.s.) at 30° knee flexion. Under weight bearing, the mean TTTG was significantly smaller at both 0° knee flexion 6.3 ± 3.2 mm (p = 0.040) and 30° knee flexion 4.9 ± 3.9 mm (p = 0.006) compared to the lying position with 0° knee flexion. CONCLUSION: Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove distance depends on both knee flexion angle and weight bearing. The latter only seems to be of relevance in full extension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izadpanah et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: