This study investigated to what degree three different warm-up routines affect 50-yard swim performance (45.7m). The 4 female and 9 male participants, NCAA Division I swimmers, performed on three different days, a general swimming warm-up (SWIM), a combination of plyometric exercises and swimming warm-up (COMBO), or a single 50yard Swim at 90% of the maximum effort (SHORT). Each treatment was followed by 50-Yard Freestyle swimming Sprint at maximal effort following a 5-minute rest period after the completion of each warm-up procedure. Self-reported heart rate was recorded after each maximal effort. The time of each trial was recorded using a standard Colorado Timing System. Although the 50y sprint performance was not significantly affected by the SWIM, the SHORT and the COMBO warm-up (23.79 sec ±2.32), (23.74 sec ±2.12), (23.63sec ± 2.21) respectively, 7 out of the 13 swimmers swam their fastest time with the SHORT warm-up and only three swam their fastest with the conventional warm-up (SWIM). Heart rates, on the other hand, were significantly (p<.05) higher following the SHORT warm up compared to the SWIM and the COMBO warm ups. However, individual differences revealed that some athletes could benefit from a plyometric/swimming warm-up in order to improve overall swimming performance, especially when considering that a few hundredths of a second would make a significant difference in the outcome of a given race, It appears that the standard warm-up may not produce the best results for all swimmers. It is important to look at individual data when dealing with elite athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Nawaiseh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: