Assesses machine-learning interatomic potentials for evaluating adsorption energy, suggesting efficient methodologies.
Adsorption-energy calculations are essential for understanding molecule–surface interactions, but full DFT optimization remains too expensive for high-throughput screening. Here, we use a DFT single-point workflow as a platform to benchmark universal machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) for accelerated adsorption-energy evaluation. In this workflow, MLIPs optimize structures, followed by DFT single-point calculations for final adsorption-energy evaluation. Using a data set of 201 organic molecules adsorbed on Zn slabs, we compare M3GNet, eSCN, UMA, and MatterSim on adsorption-energy accuracy, adsorption-configuration fidelity, and computational cost. MatterSim delivers the best overall performance, achieving a success rate of 85.4%, a mean closest molecule–surface distance difference of 0.12 Å relative to DFT-optimized references, and an approximately 4000-fold speedup over DFT for single-point energy evaluation. UMA provides competitive ranking performance and strong binding-site prediction, despite systematically overestimating adsorbate–surface distances. These results highlight that appropriate MLIP selection is critical for enabling reliable and efficient adsorption screening of interfacial materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazhiyev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: