Key result
Strategic self-talk improves golf-putting performance ~11% over control alongside increased parasympathetic tone.
Why the study?
While the positive impact of strategic self-talk on sports performance is well documented, the underlying attentional mechanisms remain to be fully explored.
Does strategic self-talk improve golf putting performance and alter heart-rate variability in novice male sport science students?
RCT (n=39)
Single-blind
Simple randomization
No
Does strategic self-talk improve golf putting performance and alter heart-rate variability in novice male sport science students?
Strategic self-talk improves motor skill acquisition and increases parasympathetic activation (measured via HRV) during a golf-putting task in novices.
Strategic self-talk improves novice golf-putting performance; extends prior RCT evidence on attentional mechanisms with HRV correlates.
The positive impact of strategic self-talk on performance in various sports tasks has been well-documented. Contemporary research has therefore started to explore the potential mechanisms through which self-talk affects performance. The primary purpose of the present study was to examine aspects of the attentional mechanisms underlying performance on a golf putting task, endorsing a psychophysiological perspective through the assessment of Heart-Rate Variability (HRV). Participants were 40 male sport science students, with no prior experience in golf putting, who were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experiment was completed over four sessions, including baseline assessment, two training sessions, and final assessment. Participants of both groups followed the same training protocol, with the experimental group practicing strategic self-talk and developing personal self-talk plans for the final assessment. Performance and HRV were recorded during the baseline and final assessments. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the experimental group showed greater performance improvement from baseline to final assessment and superior performance compared to the control group at the final assessment. Analysis of the HRV data provided indications that the experimental group showed different patterns of Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) activation at the final assessment, showing a greater activation of the parasympathetic nervous system, in particular towards the latest stages of the golf-putting task. The HRV findings, which should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of multivariate significance, are in line with an attentional interpretation of self-talk effectiveness indicating a less effortful processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzormpatzakis et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Healthy novices (golf putting skill acquisition) (n=39). Strategic self-talk vs. Control group (standard training without self-talk) was evaluated on Golf-putting performance at final assessment (custom point system) (Hedge's g 1.05, p=0.033). Strategic self-talk significantly improved golf-putting performance compared to control (Hedge's g 1.05, p=0.033) and showed indications of increased parasympathetic activation during the later stages of the task.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: