Key result
Scoping review protocol outlines methods to define and measure multiple long-term conditions in pre-adolescent children.
Why the study?
Children in their early years are often overlooked in multimorbidity research, and it remains unclear whether existing definitions or measures of multiple long-term conditions apply prior to adolescence.
Systematic Review
This scoping review protocol outlines a methodology to conceptualize and synthesize how multiple long-term conditions are defined and measured in children prior to adolescence.
Standardized childhood multimorbidity definitions are needed before clinical use; leaves open consistent metrics for life-course research.
<ns5:p>Objective To strengthen our understanding of how multiple long-term conditions experienced during infancy and childhood are defined and measured in published research. Introduction Multiple long-term conditions, known synonymously as multimorbidity, can be experienced across all ages and are not just a feature of ageing. Despite early years growth and development being known to influence the health trajectories of individuals into adulthood, children, particularly in the early years, are often overlooked in this international field of research. Is it also unclear whether the current definitions or measures of multiple long-term conditions are applicable for children before adolescence. This review will serve to conceptualise the definitions of multiple-long term conditions prior to adolescence, synthesise how they are being operationalised and help shape future research approaches. Inclusion criteria Studies will only be included if they report on two or more co-existing mental and/or physical long-term conditions on infants, aged from birth (up to the first year of life) and/or children across the period of childhood (aged 1 to approximately 9 years old). Studies that only include participants during the period of adolescence (aged approximately 10 to 19 years old) and/or adulthood (aged 18 years old and older) will be excluded. Methods A scoping review is proposed and will follow Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology supplemented by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. An extensive search strategy within the following databases will be conducted: (1) MEDLINE; (2) EMBASE; (3) PsycINFO; (4) Scopus; (5) CINAHL (6) Web of Science (7) Global Health and (8) grey literature, using combinations of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Boolean and Emtree terms. Studies will be screened through the software, Covidence. When the inclusion criteria are met, data will be extracted and summarised to answer the proposed research questions.</ns5:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Leary et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Multiple long-term conditions. Multiple long-term conditions was evaluated on Definitions and measures of multiple long-term conditions. This scoping review protocol outlines the methodology to conceptualise definitions and synthesise the operationalisation of multiple long-term conditions in infants and children prior to adolescence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: