Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates collateral status effects on functional outcomes in ICAS-LVO, suggesting stenting improves outcomes regardless of collateral status.
Background Collateral circulation influences outcomes in large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, yet its modifying effect on endovascular therapy for intracranial atherosclerosis-related LVO (ICAS-LVO) remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether collateral status alters the association between stent-assisted thrombectomy and outcomes in anterior-circulation ICAS-LVO. Methods An analysis was performed on 271 anterior-circulation ICAS-LVO patients from the RESCUE-ICAS registry. Collateral status was graded using the Tan collateral score (0–1 = poor, 2–3 = good). Patients were treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone or MT with adjunctive stenting. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] = 0–2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included successful reperfusion (mTICI≥2b), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Results Among 271 patients, 172 (63.5% ) had good, and 99 (36.5%) had poor collaterals. In adjusted interaction models, stenting improved 90-day functional independence (aOR 3.22, p = 0.030) without significant stent–collateral interaction ( p = 0.876). No significant interactions were observed for mortality ( p = 0.847) or sICH ( p = 0.909). A significant adjusted interaction was present for final recanalization (interaction OR 8.35, p = 0.044). Conclusions In anterior-circulation ICAS-LVO, adjunctive stenting was associated with improved functional outcomes across collateral strata, with collateral status showing some modification of the stent effect on angiographic success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: