Evaluates large language model's accuracy in assisting referral triage, suggesting enhanced operational efficiency.
Manual referral triage in tertiary hospitals is resource-intensive and prone to inconsistency. This study evaluates the feasibility of an on-premises large language model (LLM), using a roster-embedded prompting strategy, to assist in subspecialty triage of referral letters. Utilizing a dataset of 6624 electronic referral letters from Samsung Medical Center, we deployed an open-source LLM (Qwen-2.5-32B) within a secure infrastructure, incorporating real-time clinician availability. In a hold-out test set ( n = 680), the LLM achieved a baseline accuracy of 75.4% (95% CI, 72.2–78.7%) compared to human coordinators, which improved to 84.7% (95% CI, 81.9–87.4%) after expert adjudication of discordant cases. Performance of frequently referred subspecialties was accuracy of 86.1%, and performance of infrequent ones was 74.4%, which were adjudicated. Error analysis revealed that misclassifications primarily occurred between clinically adjacent departments rather than at random, and a small subset of referrals (5.9%) lacked sufficient information for unique assignment. These findings demonstrate that our roster-embedded LLM can provide highly valid subspecialty assignments and serve a complementary role in referral workflows. By integrating such models into human-in-the-loop systems, tertiary hospitals may significantly enhance operational efficiency and reduce administrative burdens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: