Key result
Disease-modifying treatments reach ~60% of SMA patients, though missing data limits functional outcome evaluation.
Why the study?
Since the approval of new disease-modifying treatments, studies have reported changes in spinal muscular atrophy disease progression.
Does treatment with disease-modifying therapies improve functional status and motor milestones in patients with 5q spinal muscular atrophy compared to untreated patients?
Population
2,188 patients with genetically confirmed 5q SMA across nine European countries
Comparison
Treated with disease-modifying treatments vs never treated
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Authors
Loading...
DMT exposure was associated with altered SMA progression; leaves open comparative effectiveness and durability across therapies in broader populations.
Cohort (n=2,188)
Yes
Does treatment with disease-modifying therapies improve functional status and motor milestones in patients with 5q spinal muscular atrophy compared to untreated patients?
Real-world European registry data demonstrates functional milestones achieved by SMA patients on disease-modifying therapies, though high data missingness limits robust comparisons with untreated cohorts.
Deltour et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (n=2,188). Disease-modifying treatments (nusinersen, risdiplam, onasemnogene abeparvovec) vs. Never treated was evaluated on Best functional status and motor milestone. Among 2,188 patients with spinal muscular atrophy, 60.4% received at least one disease-modifying treatment, though high missingness of functional data in untreated patients limited evaluation of treatment-related changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: