Retrospective cohort study compares effectiveness and safety of adalimumab products in hidradenitis suppurativa, indicating no significant differences.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Comparative real-world data on originator and biosimilar adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are limited. We compared effectiveness, persistence, and safety of originator (ADL-O) versus three biosimilars (ADL-B1, ADL-B2, ADL-B3) in routine care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort of 146 biologic-naive HS patients initiating adalimumab (January 2020-November 2025) at three tertiary centers in Turkiye. Primary outcomes were Week-12 HiSCR50 and IHS4-55 responses, compared using overlap weighting. Persistence was assessed by 24-week restricted mean survival time (RMST). Safety was summarized descriptively. RESULTS: = 118) showed no evidence of differential effectiveness: HiSCR50 RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.78-1.42); IHS4-55 RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.76-1.52). Inclusion of ADL-B3 as a sensitivity analysis did not alter the findings. Among Week-52 evaluable ADL-O and ADL-B1 patients, HiSCR50 was 68.8% in both groups. Product-level 24-week RMST was 23.4 versus 22.3 weeks (difference -1.1 weeks, 95% CI - 2.7 to 0.5). Safety comparisons were descriptive given limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in short-term effectiveness was detected between originator and biosimilar adalimumab in HS. The findings reflect absence of evidence for a difference rather than equivalence. Larger prospective studies with immunogenicity assessment are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demirbaş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: