Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines hydrodynamics-aware formation control and energy efficiency in autonomous vessel fleets, highlighting key challenges.
Maritime decarbonization and the emergence of autonomous vessel fleets are motivating cooperative sailing concepts in which formation geometry serves not only as a coordination variable but also as a potential means of reducing hydrodynamic resistance. Although favorable wake and wave-interference patterns can reduce resistance in specific configurations, translating these benefits into deployable formation-control laws remains challenging. The central difficulty is cross-layer: hydrodynamic models must capture spacing- and speed-dependent interaction effects while remaining sufficiently compact, differentiable, and transferable for constrained real-time control. This review examines hydrodynamics-aware formation control for energy-efficient multi-vessel systems using a structured Scopus corpus of 193 publications. It connects three research layers that are commonly treated separately: formation-control architecture, hydrodynamic-interaction modeling, and energy-accounting fidelity. The literature is classified using a five-level evidence axis ranging from single-vessel energy optimization to closed-loop interaction-aware formation control. Empirical, potential-flow, CFD/RANS-based, reduced-order, and surrogate models are compared in terms of real-time capability, differentiability, calibration burden, transferability, and compatibility with MPC and distributed MPC. The synthesis shows that the literature contains substantial CFD, experimental, and offline configuration-optimization evidence, but very limited closed-loop validation in which hydrodynamic interaction, propulsion-realistic energy metrics, actuator constraints, communication limitations, and safety requirements are addressed together. Control-ready hydrodynamic surrogates, propulsion-aware energy accounting, robustness in mixed traffic, and field validation are therefore identified as the highest-priority research directions. A validation ladder and reporting checklist are proposed to improve comparability and support future deployment in inland, coastal, and open-water scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: