Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights biomarkers predicting metastatic risk in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, suggesting clinical implications.
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors with variable metastatic potential. While metastatic disease occurs in approximately 10–20% of cases, its prediction remains a major clinical challenge, as no histological system has been universally validated to reliably identify aggressive tumors at diagnosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of current and emerging biomarkers of metastatic risk in PPGL, encompassing histopathological scoring systems, genetic and molecular markers, biochemical phenotyping, liquid biopsy approaches, and imaging-based biomarkers. Among established markers, germline SDHB mutation status, loss of SDHB expression by immunohistochemistry, elevated plasma 3-methoxytyramine, and histopathological scoring systems such as GAPP and COPPS represent the most clinically validated tools for risk stratification. Emerging biomarkers — including somatic alterations in ATRX and TERT, genomic instability indices, tumor immune microenvironment characterization, circulating tumor DNA, and oncometabolite quantification — show promise in refining prognostic assessment but require prospective validation before routine clinical implementation. Accurate risk stratification in PPGL demands a multiparametric and dynamic approach, integrating clinical, genetic, biochemical, and molecular parameters. Future progress will depend on large prospective international cohorts, standardized biomarker platforms, and biomarker-driven clinical trial designs to translate emerging molecular knowledge into improved patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: