Commentary on the epistemic costs of super-persuasive AI technologies, contesting their sources.
In a recent article in this journal, Ari Deller has argued that there are some severe epistemic costs to super-persuasive AI. In this commentary I explain why, while I agree with Deller about the epistemic costs of super-persuasive AI, I disagree with him about the likely source of the problem. Where Deller focuses on the super-persuasive power of future AI technologies, I focus on the enormous increase in persuasive capacity that is provided by a technology that can produce very large amounts of persuasive content at minimal cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin McKenna (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: