Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved action recognition in smart environments, indicating enhanced performance across varied settings.
The increasing deployment of multi-sensor systems in smart homes, surveillance, and assistive robotics has intensified research on multi-view action recognition. While existing research is effective under fully overlapping sensor configurations, real-world systems typically exhibit partially overlapping views, where actions are visible only in a subset of sensors. This non-uniform visibility, coupled with severe occlusions and inconsistent view coverage across sensors, poses a major challenge for reliable action recognition. Moreover, most current methods focus on implicit feature fusion and overlook explicit reasoning about contextual cues and prediction-level consistency across views, leading to degraded performance under occlusion and misalignment. To address these challenges, we propose Co ntext-aware and Vi ew-consistent learning ( CoVi ), a unified method that enhances multi-view action recognition by jointly modeling contextual dependencies and cross-view coherence. CoVi introduces two plug-and-play modules: Context-aware and View-aware modules. The former adaptively integrates local human-centric and global scene-level information through gated fusion, enabling the model to emphasize informative regions and suppress background noise for fine-grained contextual reasoning. The latter enforces prediction alignment across co-visible views using confidence-weighted Jensen–Shannon divergence, ensuring consistent learning under view disparity and partial visibility. Extensive experiments conducted on two real-world home environments from the MultiSensor-Home dataset and the MM-Office dataset demonstrate that CoVi consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both uni-modal and multi-modal settings, validating its effectiveness and generalizability across diverse sensor configurations and scene types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyễn et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: