Descriptive analysis examines the link between female governance roles and audit partner gender on KAM reporting in Japan, indicating limited associations.
This study examines whether female governance representation and the presence of a female signing audit partner are associated with key audit matter (KAM) reporting in Japan. The descriptive sample comprises 9808 firm-year observations for Japanese listed companies from 2021 to 2023; primary multivariate analyses use 9794 complete cases. KAM headings were manually collected and classified as account- or entity-level matters. Poisson and zero-truncated Poisson models with firm-clustered standard errors are the primary KAM-count specifications; Tobit is retained only as a supplementary check. The interaction between female audit-partner involvement (FEAUD) and female governance representation (FEBOARD) is negative in both count models, but evidence is limited and model-dependent; the corresponding p-values are 0.067 in the Poisson model and 0.293 in the zero-truncated Poisson model. Supplementary estimates are also negative, although statistical significance varies across specifications. Conditional KAM-count differences are small and emerge mainly at higher levels of female governance representation. Evidence for total KAM-section length is weaker, and length checks indicate that any negative total-length association reflects fewer KAMs rather than shorter descriptions per KAM. Type-specific analyses provide only weak descriptive evidence. The findings are associational and do not directly measure communication, coordination, or disclosure quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shu Inoue (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: