For twenty years, American archaeology has been engaged in an effort to change the nature of the discipline. Prominent among the goals has been the creation of a "scientific" archaeology. While archaeology has changed greatly in many respects during this period, progress toward a scientific discipline has been decidedly limited. It is the contention of this paper that failure to consider critical metaphysical issues lies at the heart of this failure, and that little progress toward the initial goal can be realized until these issues are resolved. At the same time, clearer specification of the nature of the goal may call into question the reasonableness of a truly scientific archaeology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert C. Dunnell (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Anthropological Research