Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A neutron diffraction study of the 1 : 1 complex between 9-methyladenine and 1-methylthymine, C6H7N5· C6H8N2O2, has been carried out. The structure is monoclinic, space group P21/m, with two base pairs per unit cell; cell parameters a =8.304(2), b =6.552(2), c =12.837(3)Å, and β=106.83(5)°. The structure has been refined by full-matrix least squares techniques starting from the x-ray results of Hoogsteen [K. Hoogsteen, Acta Crystallogr. 12, 822 (1959); Acta Crystallogr. 16, 907 (1963)]. All hydrogen atoms have been located with a precision better than 0.01 Å, with the exception of methyl group hydrogens. The thymine molecules appear to be slightly disordered by means of a 180° rotation about N3 ··· C6, which has the effect of interchanging N1 and C5 while leaving the positions of all other atoms approximately unchanged. Between 10% and 13% of the thymine molecules in the structure are disordered in this way. Average refined neutron scattering lengths for nitrogen and carbon are b̄N=0.910(3) and b̄C=0.657(3) × 10−12 cm; oxygen and hydrogen scattering lengths were fixed at bH=−0.372 and b0=0.575 × 10−12 cm. The purine and pyrimidine bases are joined with N3 of thymine hydrogen bonded to N7 of adenine. Because of the disorder present in the structure, 87%–90% of the adenine · thymine pairs have the Hoogsteen configuration and the remainder have the reversed Hoogsteen configuration. These geometries differ from that of a Watson-Crick adenine · thymine pair in which N3 of thymine donates a proton to N1 of adenine. The hydrogen bonding scheme in the crystalline complex consists of one N–H ··· N and two N–H ··· 0 bonds and is quite normal; there is no evidence for proton transfer in any of the hydrogen bonds which are formed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frey et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: