Why the study?
Does intravenous thrombolysis have similar safety and effectiveness in patients aged >80 years compared to younger patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Does intravenous thrombolysis have similar safety and effectiveness in patients aged >80 years compared to younger patients with acute ischemic stroke?
In rural hospitals, IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients >80 years is associated with higher mortality, but age alone does not independently impact long-term functional outcome or hemorrhage risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution for IV thrombolysis in >80-year-olds due to higher mortality; leaves open independent age effects on function or hemorrhage after adjustment.
AIMS: Approximately 30% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) occurs in people aged over 80 years. Older patients are increasingly receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IV-thrombolysis) for AIS; however, the majority of treatments are carried out in urban hospitals. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of IV-thrombolysis in patients aged older than 80 years. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and epidemiological data of 409 patients with AIS who were consecutively treated with IV-thrombolysis from September 2006 to June 2012 in the three rural hospitals. RESULTS: In the analyzed group, there were 22.3% of patients who were aged over 80 years (2.4% patients aged ≥ 90 years). Among these patients we found: longer onset to door time (P = 0.04), onset to treatment time (P = 0.0003) and door to treatment time (P < 0.0001). The functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 90 days was lower (P = 0.0004), whereas the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT; P = 0.001), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) according to National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) definition (P = 0.003) and mortality rate within 3 months were higher (P < 0.0001) than in younger patients. A multivariate analysis showed no impact of older age on long-term outcome, and the presence of HT and SICH. Age over 80 years was associated with higher mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Older age affected the increased times for pre- and in-hospital procedures in rural patients with AIS. Older patients should not be denied the chance to benefit from IV-thrombolysis, but because of the higher mortality, the application of this therapy should be carefully decided on.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobolewski et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: