Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antiferromagnetic Ni-Mn and hard-magnetic CoPt-Cr stabilization schemes for magnetoresistive (MR) sensors are evaluated in this paper. Magnetic properties of Ni-Fe(bottom)/Ni-Mn(top), Ni-Mn/Ni-Fe, Co-Pt-Cr, Ni-Fe/Co-Pt-Cr and Co-Pt-Cr/Ni-Fe films used in various types of MR sensors are characterized, and the read performance of two types of MR sensors, one overlaid with a Ni-Mn film in tail regions and the other abutted with a Co-Pt-Cr film, is then studied. In the Ni-Mn stabilization scheme, the unidirectional anisotropy field of the Ni-Fe/Ni-Mn films increases when the MR sensor is thinner, and the MR responses are quiet and stable. In the Co-Pt-Cr stabilization scheme, the remanence magnetic moment and coercivity of the Co-Pt-Cr film decrease when the film is thinner, and the MR responses are quiet and stable when the magnetic moment of the Co-Pt-Cr film is higher than that of the MR film. This magnetic moment cannot be very high to prevent the reduction of sensor sensitivity and effective readwidth. To select a suitable stabilization scheme for thinner MR sensors, simplicity in sensor magnetics and fabrication should also be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: