Why the study?
Do pharmacological readthrough agents (G-418, gentamicin, PTC124) rescue the function of LQT1 nonsense mutations in HEK-293 cells?
Do pharmacological readthrough agents (G-418, gentamicin, PTC124) rescue the function of LQT1 nonsense mutations in HEK-293 cells?
Pharmacological readthrough of LQT1 nonsense mutations can partially rescue channel function, but success depends on the specific mutation and the resulting biophysical properties of the rescued channel.
G-418 partially rescues R518X function in cells despite gating shift; hypothesis-generating for readthrough in LQT1 and should not change practice.
The nonsense mutations R518X-KCNQ1 and Q530X-KCNQ1 cause LQT1 (long-QT syndrome type 1) and result in a complete loss of I(Ks) channel function. In the present study we attempted to rescue the function of these mutants, in HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293 cells, by promoting readthrough of their PTCs (premature termination codons) using the pharmacological agents G-418, gentamicin and PTC124. Gentamicin and G-418 acted to promote full-length channel protein expression from R518X at 100 μM and from Q530X at 1 mM. In contrast, PTC124 did not, at any dose tested, induce readthrough of either mutant. G-418 (1 mM) treatment also acted to significantly (P<0.05) increase current density and peak-tail current density, at +80 mV for R518X, but not Q530X, to 58±11% and 82±17% of the wild-type level respectively. However, the biophysical properties of the currents produced from R518X, while similar, were not identical with wild-type as the voltage-dependence of activation was significantly (P<0.05) shifted by +25 mV. Overall, these findings indicate that although functional rescue of LQT1 nonsense mutations is possible, it is dependent on the degree of readthrough achieved and the effect on channel function of the amino acid substituted for the PTC. Such considerations will determine the success of future therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harmer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: