Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clustering can provide important benefits for small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in the developing world. Yet gaps remain in our understanding of how such clusters organize, function and compete. This paper draws on case material from a Pakistani cluster, a global player in the world market for surgical instruments, to argue that cheap labour is an insufficient explanation for international success. Instead, it argues that collective efficiency gams of clustering namely passively acquired external economies and actively generated joint action benefits, are central to competitiveness. The paper shows that while all firms in the cluster gain from agglomeration economies, the extent of inter‐firm co‐operation, and the benefits arising from it, are highly differentiated. It concludes that external economies, while necessary, are not sufficient to bring about growth. For growth, joint action, particularly in strategic vertical ties with local subcontractors and external buyers, is critical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid Nadvi (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: