Why the study?
It was unknown whether reducing the duration of DAPT following PCI with second-generation DES is beneficial and safe in high-bleeding-risk patients.
Does short-term DAPT reduce major bleeding and maintain ischemic safety compared to long-term DAPT in high-bleeding-risk patients after PCI with second-generation DES?
Does short-term DAPT reduce major bleeding and maintain ischemic safety compared to long-term DAPT in high-bleeding-risk patients after PCI with second-generation DES?
In high-bleeding-risk patients receiving second-generation DES, short-term DAPT (<6 months) appears safe and non-inferior to standard DAPT regarding ischemic outcomes, with a trend toward reduced major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports shortening DAPT to <6 months in HBR patients with second-generation DES; reinforces individualized bleeding-risk strategies in guidelines.
Background Now that second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are available in almost every hospital in the world, it is unknown whether reducing the duration of double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) populations is beneficial and safe. Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the safety, efficacy, and advantages of shortening the duration of DAPT (<6 months) in HBR patients with second-generation DES implantation. Methods We searched Ebsco, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar databases from inception to December 2022 for papers comparing short-term DAPT (6 months) followed by aspirin or P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy with long-term DAPT (6 months) in HBR patients after PCI with second generation DES. The primary objectives are major bleeding, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), and myocardial infarction (MI), while the secondary endpoint is mortality from any cause. Random-effect models were used to assess the relative risk and 95% confidence interval. Results This study included 9,789 HBR patients from three observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (Figure 1). Short DAPT for HBR patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES had a tendency of lower incidence of major bleeding in comparison with standard (6 months) DAPT, even though statistically non-significant (2.33% vs. 3.36%, RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.39 – 1.10], p = 0.11). Short-term DAPT was also found to be comparable and non-inferior to standard DAPT with in term of stent thrombosis (0.251% vs. 0.252%, RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.46-2.17], p = 0.99), Myocardial Infarction (2.08% vs. 1.85%, RR 1.09 [95% CI 0.82-1.44], p = 0.57), and All cause of death (3.01% vs. 2.56%, RR 1.17 [95% CI 0.93-1.49], p = 0.18) (Figure 2). Conclusions Among HBR patients implanted with second-generation DES, short DAPT was associated with slightly lower but comparable risk of major bleeding and non-inferior to reduce stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and all cause of death compared to standard DAPT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Intan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: