Why the study?
To describe clinical features, treatments, and surgical outcomes of spinal leiomyosarcoma.
What are the clinical features, treatments, and surgical outcomes of primary versus metastatic spinal leiomyosarcoma?
What are the clinical features, treatments, and surgical outcomes of primary versus metastatic spinal leiomyosarcoma?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with spinal leiomyosarcoma, metastatic lesions, thoracic or lumbar location, myelopathy, and male sex are associated with a significantly higher risk of death compared to primary lesions.
OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical features, treatments, and surgical outcomes of spinal leiomyosarcoma (sLMS). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 studies (January 1, 2000 to January 18, 2024) reporting on 109 patients: 39 (36%) with primary spinal lesions, 67 (61%) with metastases, and 3 (3%) with lesions of unknown origin. We compared clinical features, treatments, and outcomes between primary and metastatic sLMS. RESULTS: Lesions were thoracic in 56% of primary and 42% of metastatic cases (P = 0.07). En bloc resection was performed at a higher rate for metastases (22%) than for primary lesions (15%), and laminectomy/decompression was performed at a higher rate for metastases (25%) than for primary lesions (10%) (P = 0.07). Metastases received chemotherapy more frequently (49%) than primary lesions did (15%) (P = 0.002). Median overall survival was 46 months (95% confidence interval: 20-72 months) for metastases and was not reached for primary lesions. Median progression-free survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval: 10-19 months) for metastases and not reached for primary lesions. The following were associated with a greater likelihood of death: thoracic location (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 27.6; P < 0.01), lumbar location (aHR: 26.9; P = 0.03), myelopathy (aHR: 26.4; P = 0.01), metastatic lesion (aHR: 11.8; P < 0.001), and male sex (aHR: 4.68; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors that may be associated with foreshortened survival after surgical resection for sLMS. Studies with longer follow-up are warranted to examine these relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serrato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: