Why the study?
Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy may experience intraoperative neurologic deficits during carotid cross-clamping, and this study aimed to assess the impact of the Gupta MICA risk calculator in predicting these deficits.
Does the Gupta MICA risk calculator predict intraoperative neurologic deficits in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
Does the Gupta MICA risk calculator predict intraoperative neurologic deficits in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
The Gupta MICA score, particularly in combination with obesity and contralateral stenosis, may help stratify the risk of intraoperative neurologic deficits during carotid endarterectomy.
MICA score may aid IND stratification during CEA but should not change practice; leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may experiment intraoperative neurologic deficits (IND) during carotid cross-clamping. This work aimed to assess the impact of the Gupta Perioperative Myocardial Infarct or Cardiac Arrest (MICA) risk calculator in the IND. METHODS: From January 2012 to April 2021, patients undergoing CEA with regional anaesthesia for carotid stenosis with IND and consecutively control operated patients without IND were selected. A regressive predictive model was created, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied for comparison. A multivariable dependence analysis was conducted using a classification and regression tree (CRT) algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 97 out of 194 included patients developed IND. Obesity showed aOR = 4.01 (95% CI: 1.66-9.67) and MICA score aOR = 1.21 (1.03-1.43). Higher contralateral stenosis showed aOR = 1.29 (1.08-1.53). The AUROC curve was 0.656. The CRT algorithm differentiated obese patients with a MICA score ≥ 8. Regarding non-obese patients, the model identified the presence of contralateral stenosis ≥ 55% with a MICA ≥ 10. CONCLUSION: MICA score might play an additional role in stratifying patients for IND in CEA. Obesity was determined as the best discrimination factor, followed by a score ≥ 8. A higher ipsilateral stenosis degree is suggested to have a part in avoiding procedure-related IND. Larger studies might validate the benefit of MICA score regarding the risk of IND.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira-Macedo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: