To compare the results of hearing preservation surgeries using different approaches--the enlarged middle cranial fossa approach and the retrosigmoid approach--and different classification systems, stressing the importance of preserving "normal hearing," we performed a retrospective case review in a tertiary care medical center. The charts of 107 patients with vestibular schwannoma who underwent tumor resection were reviewed. Hearing preservation was reported according to 2 different classification systems: the modified Sanna classification and the classification of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The facial nerve results were graded according to the House-Brackmann scale. The hearing preservation rates differed markedly depending on the classification used. We conclude that hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma is a more difficult proposition than most surgeons appreciate, especially in terms of serviceable hearing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanna et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: