Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An approach is suggested for using ligands to control exchange coupling in multinuclear ions. The idea arose from structural, EPR, and magnetic studies of [PPh 4 ]3 (Scheme 1). Ferromagnetic coupling has been found between the Co II and each Co III in 3 with J = −22 ± 5 cm −1 ( JS 1 · S 2 ). It is suggested that dominant antiferromagnetic superexchange is absent because of the strong σ‐donor capacity of the tetradentate ligand [k 4 ‐PAC * ] 4− (Fig. 1). The ligand interacts at Co III primarily with a single d orbital; it is thus best able to participate in superexchange. The interaction makes the unique d orbital strongly σ‐antibonding and empty for each d 6 , S = 1, Co III ion in 3, that is, unavailable for antiferromagnetic coupling, but available for ferromagnetic pathways by a Goodenough‐Kanamori mechanism. By corollary, when any [k 4 ‐PAC * ] 4− ‐type ligand with any magnetic ion M a in the tetradentate site binds any magnetic ion M b in the bidentate site, ferromagnetic coupling should be favored provided M a is not a d 9 ion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon‐Wylie et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: