Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spin labels attached to two residues of a protein chain have less conformational flexibility than those attached to a single residue and thus lead to a narrower spatial distribution of the unpaired electron. The case of Cu 2+ labels based on the double-histidine (dHis) motif is of particular interest, as it combines the advantage of precise localization of the unpaired electron with a labelling scheme orthogonal to the more common cysteine-based labelling. Here, we introduce an approach for in silico spin labelling of a protein by dHis motifs and Cu 2+ complexes of iminodiacetic acid or nitrilotriacetic acid. We discuss a computerized scan for native histidine pairs that might be prone to bind such Cu 2+ complexes and spin-labelling site pair scans that can identify suitable double mutants for labelling. Predicted distance distributions between two Cu 2+ labels are compared to experimental distance distributions. We also test the hypothesis that elastic network modelling of conformational transitions with Cu 2+ -dHis labels can provide more accurate structural models than with nitroxide labels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: