Key result
Patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery had significantly increased odds of conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjuncts (OR 2.889).
Why the study?
Intrathecal fentanyl in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is beneficial, but its utilization rate in community settings is unknown.
Does the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia reduce the need for conversion to general anesthesia or systemic anesthetic adjuncts in patients undergoing cesarean delivery?
Observational (n=761)
No
Does the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia reduce the need for conversion to general anesthesia or systemic anesthetic adjuncts in patients undergoing cesarean delivery?
The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery significantly reduces the odds of requiring conversion to general anesthesia or systemic anesthetic adjuncts.
Avoiding intrathecal fentanyl may raise conversion risk in cesarean spinal anesthesia; leaves open benefit of routine use pending randomized trials.
Background: The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been shown to be beneficial, but its rate of utilization in the community setting is unknown. The primary aim of our study was to determine the rate of intrathecal fentanyl use for cesarean deliveries with spinal anesthesia in a community hospital, and our secondary aim was to determine its effect on anesthetic outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent cesarean delivery from June 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 with spinal anesthesia as the initial anesthetic technique were included. Results: Seven hundred sixty-one cesarean deliveries met inclusion criteria, and 161 (21.2%) patients received intrathecal fentanyl in their spinal anesthetic for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model that controlled for patient weight and time from spinal placement to procedure end showed that patients who received intrathecal fentanyl were less likely to have conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjuncts compared to patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl (odds ratio 2.889, 95% CI 1.552-5.903; P=0.0017). Conclusion: Only 1 in 5 patients received intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean deliveries performed under spinal anesthesia in a community hospital despite known benefits. Patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl had increased odds of conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjunct administration, a finding consistent with previous studies. The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery should be strongly considered in the community setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brewer et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cesarean delivery (n=761). Intrathecal fentanyl vs. No intrathecal fentanyl was evaluated on Conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjuncts (OR 2.889, 95% CI 1.552-5.903, p=0.0017). Patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery had significantly increased odds of conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjuncts (OR 2.889).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: