Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An intensive sampling campaign was performed in Fresno, CA during December 2003 measuring fine particulate matter including both the semi-volatile and nonvolatile fractions of the aerosol. Both the newly developed R&P FDMS Monitor and a PC-BOSS have been shown to measure total PM 2.5 concentrations including semi-volatile nitrate and organic material. Good agreement was observed between the PC-BOSS and the R&P FDMS Monitor in this study with linear regression analysis resulting in a zero-intercept slope of 1.00 ± 0.02 and an R 2 = 0.93. Several real-time measuring systems including the R&P Differential TEOM, the Met One BAMS, and a GRIMM Monitor were also employed and comparisons of total PM 2.5 mass were made with the R&P FDMS Monitor. Agreement among these various monitors was generally good. However, differences were sometimes seen. Reasons for observed differences in the real-time mass measurement systems are explained by the composition and complexity of the measured aerosol, most importantly the com...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grover et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: