Oxytetracycline–glucose–yeast extract agar (OGYA), gentamicin–glucose–yeast extract agar (GGYA) with the antibiotic added separately or sterilized with the medium, chlortetracycline–Rose Bengal agar (CRA), chloramphenicol‐streptomycin agar (PYA) and to a lesser extent, oxytetracycline–gentamicin–glucose–yeast extract agar (OGGYA) with or without Rose Bengal added, have been compared for the selective enumeration of moulds in foods. The results obtained from dried cereal products show that the media are almost equally productive and selective when applied to such foods, but Rose Bengal limits the size of mould colonies. When examining fresh proteinaceous foods, such as minced meat and chicken, CR agars and to a certain extent gentamicin‐containing agars show the distinct advantage of being much more inhibitory towards the psychrotrophic Gram negative rods that predominate in the associated flora of such foods. Oxytetracycline–glucose–yeast extract agar lost its bacteriostatic properties when heavily challenged with proteinaceous substrates and/or incubated for longer periods at 37° or even at 25°. For such applications chloramphenicol was found to be the antibiotic of choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mossel et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: