Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: Polypharmacy exists in children and young people (CYP), generating clinician concern and a desire to deprescribe. This study validated and applied a questionnaire to assess the attitudes of CYP and their parents/guardians towards polypharmacy and deprescribing. METHODS: A paediatric version of the Revised Patient Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) was developed-the Child and Parent Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (CHATD) questionnaire. Validation included: Content evaluation, face validity, factor analysis, internal reliability and test re-test reliability. Participants were prospectively recruited from three UK paediatric hospitals. The questionnaire comprised two global questions and four factors concerning participants medications: burden, appropriateness, concerns about stopping and involvement. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree; appropriateness reverse scored). RESULTS: ≥ 0.7) and test-retest reliability (all ICCs >0.75). Compared with parents, CYP reported greater medication burden (3.0 vs. 2.4, p = .003), lower perceived appropriateness (3.6 vs. 4.2, p = .008) and less involvement (3.8 vs. 4.8, p < .001). Most parents (70%) and 55% of CYPs were happy to have a medication deprescribed if the doctor agreed. Among CYP, higher appropriateness scores were associated with greater satisfaction with current medications (OR 9.34, 95% CI 3.39-25.77) and lower willingness to stop a medicine (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.48). CONCLUSIONS: CHATD is a valid, reliable tool for assessing deprescribing attitudes among CYP and parents. Most respondents were willing to consider deprescribing under medical guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: