Key result
A novel three-step ECG algorithm significantly improved medical students' ability to correctly identify cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter compared to no guidance (mean 8.12 vs 5.68; P<0.001).
Why the study?
CTI-AFL has a highly effective ablation strategy, but clinical experience demonstrates that providers often have difficulty distinguishing AFL from atrial fibrillation.
Does a novel ECG-based three-step algorithm improve the identification of CTI-AFL by medical students compared to no additional guidance?
Observational (n=50)
Does a novel ECG-based three-step algorithm improve the identification of CTI-AFL by medical students compared to no additional guidance?
Mean Difference: 2.44
Absolute Event Rate: 8.12% vs 5.68%
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel three-step ECG algorithm significantly improves the accuracy of medical students in identifying cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter compared to no guidance.
May aid ECG training for atrial flutter; hypothesis-generating, requiring validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter (CTI-AFL) is an important arrhythmia to recognise because there is a highly effective and relatively low-risk ablation strategy. However, clinical experience has demonstrated that providers often have difficulty distinguishing AFL from atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We developed a novel ECG-based three-step algorithm to identify CTI-AFL based on established CTI flutter characteristics and verified on consecutive ablation cases of typical flutter, atypical flutter and atrial fibrillation. The algorithm assesses V1/inferior lead F-wave concordance, consistency of P-wave morphology and the presence of isoelectric intervals in the inferior leads. In this observation study, the algorithm was validated on a cohort of 50 second-year medical students. Students were paired in a control and experimental group, and each pair received 10 randomly selected ECGs (from a pool of 50 intracardiac electrogram-proven CTI-AFL and 50 AF or atypical AFL cases). The experimental group received a cover sheet with the CTI algorithm, and the control group received no additional guidance. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean number of correctly identified ECGs among the students in the experimental and control groups (8.12 vs 5.68, p<0.001). Students who used the algorithm correctly identified 2.44 more ECGs as being CTI-AFL or not CTI-AFL. Using the electrophysiology study as the gold standard, the algorithm had an accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 78% and negative predictive value of 84% in identifying CTI-AFL. CONCLUSION: We developed a three-step ECG algorithm that provides a simple, sensitive, specific and accurate tool to identify CTI-AFL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frisch et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter (CTI-AFL) (n=50). Three-step ECG algorithm vs. No additional guidance was evaluated on Mean number of correctly identified ECGs (MD 2.44, p=<0.001). A novel three-step ECG algorithm significantly improved medical students' ability to correctly identify cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter compared to no guidance (mean 8.12 vs 5.68; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: