Key result
Dual antiplatelet therapy yields ~2.4-point lower early neurologic deterioration in anterior circulation stroke.
Why the study?
Anterior circulation stroke differs from posterior circulation stroke, leading investigators to evaluate whether the risk of early neurologic deterioration and its response to dual antiplatelet therapy varies by stroke territory.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduce the risk of early neurologic deterioration at 7 days differently in patients with acute mild-to-moderate anterior circulation stroke versus posterior circulation stroke?
RCT (n=2,431)
Open-label, blinded-endpoint
Randomized treatment assignment
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduce the risk of early neurologic deterioration at 7 days differently in patients with acute mild-to-moderate anterior circulation stroke versus posterior circulation stroke?
In patients with acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke presenting within 48 hours, early neurologic deterioration is more frequent in anterior circulation stroke, and dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin is significantly more effective than aspirin alone at preventing early deterioration and improving 90-day functional outcomes in anterior circulation stroke, though no significant treatment-by-territory interaction was observed.
Supports dual antiplatelet therapy to prevent early deterioration in anterior circulation stroke; extends randomized evidence on territory-specific effects.
Background Anterior circulation stroke (ACS) differs from posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in several aspects. We hypothesize that the risk of early neurologic deterioration (END) and its responses to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone may be different between stroke territories. Methods and Results This was a prespecified post hoc analysis of ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial and included patients with definite infarct location who were classified into ACS and PCS according to stroke territory. Primary outcome was occurrence of END at 7 days, defined as ≥2‐point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline. We compared the treatment effects of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in each stroke territory. From 3000 patients, 2431 eligible patients (1780 with ACS [910 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 870 assigned into aspirin alone] and 651 with PCS [371 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 280 assigned into aspirin alone]) were included. Median age was 66 years and 35.1% were women. The occurrence of END was higher in ACS than PCS (6.8% versus 3.8%, P =0.007). clopidogrel plus aspirin was associated with lower risk of END in ACS (risk difference [95% CI]: −2.4% [−4.1% to −0.8%], P =0.004), but not in PCS (risk difference [95% CI]: −0.6% [−2.7% to 1.5%], P =0.57). No significant interaction was found ( P =0.69). Conclusions Our study demonstrated END was higher in acute mild‐to‐moderate ischemic stroke with anterior circulation, who derived more benefit from clopidogrel plus aspirin than aspirin alone. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02869009.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke (anterior vs posterior circulation) (n=2,431). Clopidogrel plus aspirin vs. Aspirin alone was evaluated on Early neurologic deterioration (END) at 7 days (≥2-point increase in NIHSS score compared with baseline, excluding cerebral hemorrhage) in anterior circulation stroke (ARR -2.4%, 95% CI -4.1% to -0.8%, p=0.004). Clopidogrel plus aspirin reduced 7-day early neurologic deterioration compared with aspirin alone in anterior circulation stroke (5.6% vs 8.0%; RD -2.4%, P=0.004), but not in posterior stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: